Learn Python 3 Programming PRO Negative Reviews

Learn Python 3 Programming PRO App Complaints & User Negative Comments 2024

Learn Python 3 Programming PRO app received 8 complaints, negative comments and reviews by users. Have you ever had a bad experience using Learn Python 3 Programming PRO? Can you share your negative thoughts about learn python 3 programming pro?

Learn Python 3 Programming PRO for Negative User Reviews

✓ AdsEven after I purchased pro ads still pop up in the compiler. You should not have to wait to compile. An add will pop up every time.Big bill and his dogVersion: 1.6.1

✓ WasteThis app doesn’t deserve any star....Gasb007Version: 1.3.2

✓ TerminalWhere is the terminal so I can install additional libraries?.E1232123Version: 1.8.2

✓ App won’t load after payment for upgradeDisappointed that app won’t load after upgrade. How do I claim my money back?.& EBVersion: 1.1.0

✓ Reads like a dictionaryHere's the facts with no output examples. Some of the facts don't match the code given..Yroc31Version: 1.1.0

✓ Compiler not executing codes as intendedHi!! I just bought this app and realized the compiler doesn’t execute codes as intended. Can this be improved else I need a refund..Pussyfoot21Version: 1.3.2

✓ Useful materials but with fatal problemGood content regarding to the programming However, as mentioned in the app, Python has a unique way of creating blocks, not with specific symbols, but with indentation All indentations in the code are not properly displayed in this app and that is a fatal problem For beginners, they can not even study it And with the complexity of the program goes up, even for those have some understanding of Python can’t read the program in this app I have to request refund.PostorderVersion: 1.6.0

✓ Flawed contentCovers quite a bit of ground... but does so rather poorly. May be used as a reminder of basic syntax and an overview of library capabilities. Certainly not as a substitute for the docs or how the libraries actually operate / does. examples are not well thought through. For instance, to demonstrate dataframe functions (e.g. apply and pipe) they generate a 5x3 df array of *random* numbers and show an example piece of code and its output..... Well there's no saying what the code does given the input is random (and they dont show that input random table). They could have typed just a few more characters so we can see what the input df was, or display the random input table... Looks to me like this was never re-read by its authors with the questions: can one make sense of this without having to guess (ain't that the point?) bottom line: lazy writing = waste of reader's time. It's a lot of content, but lacking in clarity..FrancoistooVersion: 1.6.1

Learn Python 3 Programming PRO works most of the time. If it is not working for you, we recommend you excersise some patience and retry later or contact Learn Python 3 Programming PRO.